GSN:
Why
did you decide to write a revised version of "Vintage Spirits
& Forgotten Cocktails" instead of an entirely new book?
TH: Frankly,
it all started because the first edition went, unexpectedly,
out of print – which launched a real scramble for the ownership of the
book. I
was surprised that Quarry terminated it and wanted to acquire the
rights for
myself...as did at least three other publishers. In defense of Quarry,
I was
the first cocktail book they ever published. In general, they do books
on
architecture, crafts, and the like. I think they were caught off guard
by the
fast outcry. They eventually said to me that they would retain rights
and that
they would really like a revised edition. I agreed with the following
provisos....I would have creative control, I would have better
royalties. With
only one major exception, they kept that bargain, and in the end, I
found myself quite proud of this book.
GSN: While
doing research for this book, did you uncover any surprises?
TH: Oh,
SO many. There
were so many wonderful facts just waiting to be
discovered and I reveled in every one of them. This book was an utter
pleasure
to do.
I
think one of the limitations of cocktail books is that
they limit themselves to the glossy veneer of cocktail culture. I
always want
to push deeper into the culture of the day...cocktails never happened
in a
vacuum, and yet they were iconic of what what happening in the larger
world.
That
said, the most interesting thing in retrospect
was an abstraction: the farther afield I took the lines of
correspondence
between specific drinks (or cocktails in general) and the wider world
that was
the incubator for their creation, the more I enjoyed the telling, and
the more
broadly persuasive was the impact of both what I wrote and the
cognition of how
and why these drinks and the craftsmen (and that includes women) who
made them
were much more than a series of recipes in a misunderstood niche.....to
cut to
the chase, the broader the zeitgeist, the more valuable the knowledge
imparted.
GSN: What
do you feel has revived the cocktail since its' near death during the
dark days of prohibition?
TH: Cocktails
had been around for over a hundred years
already then – and were beginning to seem stuffy and tired. Prohibition
made
people miss them immediately and those lucky enough to journey to
Europe met
with a fresher take on the cocktails being made.
But to the question: I think initially it was the swank lounge scene
that focused
the interest – based on the chimera of sophisticated cocktail parties
of the
‘50s and ‘60s. Trouble was, by then, cocktails weren’t what was being
consumed at
those
parties, mainly highballs and lighter fair....by the ‘60s even VERIFIED
cocktails were
being served like highballs....Martinis, Manhattans, Jack Roses....all
on ice
(and sometimes crushed ice.) But no matter....the lounge set
was really
into music....Rat Pack and brash jazz. What they wanted was the iconic
conical
Martini-style cocktail glass, but they sure as hell didn’t want a real
Martini
in it. This was early to mid ‘90s.
Back at the end of the ‘80s, I was beginning
to espouse the germinal concept of cocktail revival, but nobody was
listening
to me then. In New York Dale DeGroff was doing the same thing – but
from a
fresh and defined ingredient perspective. People WERE listening to
Dale, but
only in New York. Still, the combo of that info in the New York nexus
and the
swanksters promoting the iconic glass image (which I believe began --
faux-cocktail-wise -- in one or more chain hotel drink
gimmick/promotions in
the late ‘80s.) The “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” character of svelte
sophistication
as nostalgia. By ‘95 the Internet was becoming pervasive – if not
yet
exactly mainstream. I was an early cocktail adopter and began to have
an
impact, especially after I became the spirits maven for what was then
the 800lb
gorilla in the room, America Online. Being suddenly interconnected,
even simply
with only other AOL
members gave individual
interests national exposure. Here
is were we learned of Dale, where I met Gary Regan, Bill Grimes, and
Ted Breaux
- and made contact with the future standard bearers of the cocktail
resurgence.
AOL began making a number of silly bureaucratic tactical mistakes with
its
forums, policies, plans and direction. It had become unpleasant to be
around,
and it forced my onto the very-much-wider World Wide Web. It wasn’t
anywhere
near as user friendly back then – especially considering that a 28.8
dial-up modem
was considered blazingly fast. Yet the information began to flow.
On the other
end of things, the Lounge crowd could only go so far began they would
naturally
encounter a REAL cocktail of some sort, and some would inevitably like
it. This
would lead
to bartender involvement as a matter of necessity as they began making
drinks of
a style largely sidelined since the early ‘50s. At that point it was
only a
matter of
time. By Vintage Spirits & Forgotten Cocktails in 2004, I was
already an old
hand and was worrying that I’d waited too long for my book
to make an impact. By the new millennium, there was already some
evidence of
sublimation of our cocktail aims. As it turned out, the
book hit
the market like a long shot horse wagered to win by the crazy guy
with a
system, when everyone went wild as Beetlebomb was first by a nose! The
hiccups
of sublimation I spoke of were strongly counterbalanced by the
emergence of the
next generation of aficionados taking their own positions as beacons
for the next
wave of newbies to follow....thus Paul Harrington led to Robert Hess –
and to
my mind, that’s as clear as it gets.
GSN: If
someone was just starting out as a cocktail enthusiast in 2009, what
books
would you recommend they read?
TH: Vintage
Spirits, Killer Cocktails, Joy of Mixology, The Essential
Cocktail, Chas. Baker, Sippin'’ Safari, The Essential Bartender’s
Guide,
and Jerry Thomas – just for perspective as to how far we’ve come. I
have to
say, this list has changed substantially as web info has increased in
quality.
Much of what was previously mysterious has now been parsed conveniently
for new
cocktail explorers. All of the recent books now on my list provide good
cocktail theory, good recipes, and good bar instruction. Most make it
clear
where ingredients can be found and tend to lead the reader on a journey
into
various worthy hideaways in the larger cocktail maze. The same can be
said
about the vintage books I include, but they mainly set the scene for a
better
understanding of the width and breadth of the culture we’d lost for
quite some
time.
GSN:
You
have been instrumental in getting the Museum of the American
Cocktail established. Why did you choose New Orleans as the
location?
TH: It
wasn’t just me, it was the whole Board of Directors who unanimously
gave the nod to New Orleans...Dale DeGroff, the world’s most celebrated
barman
and his wife Jill, Phil Greene – a
descendant of Antoine Amedee Peychaud, Chris
McMillan – the patron saint of New Orleans mixologists – and his wife
Laura,
Robert Hess – cocktail evangelist and star of video series “The
Cocktail
Spirit”, Tim McNally and Brenda Maitland – journalists on wine and
spirits, and
myself. Speaking, I think, for all of us.... New Orleans is a perfect
fit for
us for several reasons: it is central in the country making it more
convenient
for travel than either coast would be, it exists as a referent to a
world of a
different time (exactly as does our museum) and most importantly it
celebrates
history and the convivial arts as no other city does. To that I would
add that
we all love it.
GSN: What
forgotten spirit would you most like to see come back and why?
TH: We
all have witnessed the long-awaited revival of a number of cocktail
constituents. Of those, I’d say it is a tie between the original 70
proof Amer
Picon and the original Lillet recipe.
GSN: What
is your most treasured cocktail related possession?
TH: There
are three: My bottles of Carypton, Secrestat Bitters, and Koosh
Bitters. Carypton was a product issued by Angostura before
Prohibition. We believe it was a seriously alcohol-laden version
of falernum, though, according to Dave Wondrich (from whom I got the
alert of the bottle's availability), the product's original color was
green....presumably honoring the lime juice. A serious stab at an
alcoholized falernum is a worthy endeavor.
The other two are bitters that, once Prohibition took effect in
America, gained credence as cocktail-worthy. We NEVER saw them in
the U.S. Yet they appear tantalizingly in the British "Cafe Royal
Cocktail Book". I'm just thrilled to own full examples of both.
GSN: What
is your all-time favorite name for a cocktail?
TH: The
Symphony
of Moist Joy.
GSN: Speaking
of moist joy, tell me about your acting experience in "Super Bad."
TH: Chris
Spellman, the production designer, has always been a promoter of
mine, both in my film graphic designer career and in my guise as
Dr.Cocktail. I
was hired to do the voluminous liquor labels and other graphics for the
film.
The director, Greg Mottola, and I because friends, and very
unexpectedly he
wanted me for the bartender in the movie. He and the crew advocated
giving me a
scenario, not lines. So I tried the role, by turns, as aggressive,
judgmental,
and obsequious. It was a lovely experience with lots of props from the
REAL
actors!
GSN: You've
worked in the film industry for a number of years. How do
you feel cocktails have been portrayed in the movies?
TH: Great
question! You can establish the era you are viewing by the
depiction of cocktails in film. In general, the early days saw the
upper class
drinking. This might lead to some inebriation, but it was all portrayed
with
some class...often with sardonic intent. Cocktails were always a
dramatic
device in film, but exactly what they portrayed and represented changed
continually over the years. In the final tally, cocktails have run the
gamut
from worshipped and reviled in film. To my mind, that suggests film,
like
journalism, is doing its job.
GSN: Who
are some of your favorite imbibing actors and actresses in film?
Bogart,
William & Eleanor Powell, Sean Connery?
TH: No
one played intoxicated better than Charlie
Chaplin. A meditation on his short reels displays a feeling for, and
understanding of, the internal manifestations of “schnockered” better
than
anyone since. A larger (and equally-valued) number can play inebriation
observed well, Chaplin took you into the boozy mind with (if I
may use a
countermanding term,) clarity. All those you mentioned I hold in great
regard.
There are so many more worthy of mention...why not give you one no one
knows?
Luther Alder: In the American remake of Fritz Lang’s “M” he plays the
lawyer.
Raymond Burr is a henchman.. Alder’s role is superb, and the film worth
searching
out.
GSN: If
you were to nominate the most important, iconic cocktail, what would
it be?
TH: There
can only be one answer: The Martini. Other cocktails are
important, historic, cultural
harbingers of the future, but only the Martini
rises to the level of icon. To figure out how and why this happened,
check out
Lowell Edmund’s “Martini, Straight Up”.
GSN: What
is the best cocktail you've ever had and where?
TH: That
is very hard to say. Best Martini was in a locals dive bar in
Vegas. Best of so many classics were at my house...not because I mixed
them so
superbly, but because that first encounter of something wonderful ends
up being
the most memorable. If I had to recall one utterly ascendant
cocktail I
had in a commercial venue, it would have to be the Mai Tai I was first
served
at Madam Wu’s in Santa Monica by the great Tony Ramos, with the future
Beachbum
Berry at my side.
GSN: What
is the worst cocktail you've ever had and where was it?
TH: There
were two. One was ordered for me in Richmond, VA by then-future GWAR
member, Chuck Varga aka the Sexecutioner. It was in a joint named
McLean's...one still exists there, but the one we frequented was on
Grace
Street in the Fan – a hotbed of artsy Virginia Commonwealth University
students
– and long ago closed. What I had was a Jackass Flat, and in modern
parlance,
it was a bar mat martini.
The second was more charming. I
don’t remember where it was but I walked in and
ordered a Singapore Sling. Without missing a beat the bartender made
the drink
and a waitress brought it over to our table. It tasted like gin, red
wine,
maybe a persimmon or two, and maybe some prune juice. I whipped my head
around
toward the bartender, and he just sagged. He simply played the odds he
could
bullshit his way through making a drink he knew the color of but had
ABSOLUTELY
NO IDEA what was in. It was really pretty funny. Of course then there
was the
night of flaming shots of 151, but that doesn’t qualify as a cocktail
does it?
GSN: Lastly,
what in your opinion is the origin of the name
"cocktail"?
TH: The
only theory that has any substantiation to speak of is the morning
angle. The position of the early cocktail as a morning beverage cannot
be
disputed. As such, it’s hard to dismiss the bitters. Bitters as
medicine
combine with hair of the dog to indeed create an “anti-fogmatic”. The
use
of the
cock or rooster as an auditory symbol of morning awakening far precedes
the any
of the mixed drinks we ponder. Because of the bitters, the cocktail was
a fancy
drink, and calling it a “cock-tail” suggests morning, plus the end of
something, (a night of over indulgence perhaps?) plus a certain
liveliness as
the rooster awakes to strut anew, plus the bird’s plumage – befitting a
fancy
drink. 
Ted Haigh is a regular
contributor to Imbibe Magazine and currently works for the Hollywood
film industry as a graphic designer. His film work
includes "American Beauty", "O Brother, Where Art Thou?", "The Road to
Perdition" and the TV miniseries "John Adams" for which he won an
Excellence in Production Design Award from the Art Directors
Guild. His latest project "Battle: Los Angeles" is in production.
"Vintage Spirits and Forgotten Cocktails" was published on July 1, 2009.
He can be reached
at www.tedhaigh.com
Blair Frodelius lives in upstate New York and is the
editor of Good Spirits News. He is also a professional musician
and is co-founder of Out of the Box Entertainment. He can be
reached at
goodspirits@frodelius.com
- Interviewed by Blair Frodelius; Aug 25 & 29, 2009
Good Spirits News